Wednesday, June 2, 2010

What Jill Said

We've mentioned this before, but you don't get the whole story.  Anything we post here is viewable by Jill and Cindy.  What that means unfortunately is that when some of you get a little nervous, we can't always put your minds at ease.  There are things that we have done with our sissies for our amusement.  It's actually quite fun to take one of them way past their limits.   Some of you may remember back in September when Jill was never going to wear pantyhose or a bra.  We have limits too.  We've set out to not do things that will permanently damage them.  We will not put them on hormones to grow their breasts, but we also won't put them in situations that could damage them permanently  psychologically either.   We're making them walk a very difficult path and do it in high heels, but there is a tomorrow for both of them when they go back to living totally as guys...if that's what they want.  I really don't want to get too deep with this.  It isn't what the blogs are supposed to be about, but I want some of you to know that you don't have to worry without posting all our plans for the sissy to see.

P.S.  Somebody just asked me if it was them I was talking about--it wasn't.  I've just had a few comments of concern and wanted to set some minds at ease.

5 comments:

  1. I've read these blogs for quite some time now, and I always got the idea that you ladies were looking out for the girls, even as you pushed them further and further. I'm willing to not read about your plans for the girls in advance, just as long as we get the story afterwards. And I do love the pictures. LGB

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think I'm the only person who went from "fan" to participant. I can tell you for a fact that there is a lot of looking out for the girls. The reason they took awhile to take me up on my offer, is they wanted to make sure I wasn't some psycho who'd abuse the sissies...well not too much anyway ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am not worried about the girls taking the sissies past their limits. I don’t think they can. I see no sign of Stockholm syndrome or any other mental duress in either of their writings. While they allow themselves to be restrained, they could exit this situation if they wanted to. For now this is the path of least resistance. Should the girls try to force behavior that is viewed as worse that the threat of exposure, they will flee. The breaking point changes with conditioning. Having Jill perform a hand job last October, I believe, would have caused him to flee. If things are as you say, you should be on solid ground.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You wrote “We will not put them on hormones to grow their breasts, but we also won't put them in situations that could damage them permanently psychologically either.” I am probably one of the least knowledgeable persons here regarding the use of hormones. It is pointless for me to comment on them. In your first post you said “We’re interested both in humiliating her and making her constantly more feminine”. You have certainly made permanent changes to his personality. He will never be the Bill you meet last August. Whether you have made him a better person or damaged his masculinity could be debated. I am taking a wait and see attitude.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Both sissies have brought up topics that I feel are very blog worthy. Blow job practice and when and why the sissies were nude in front of you is much more interesting than trying on bridal gowns. I only use bridal gowns as an example, no offense Cindy. The sissies opened the door, so I don’t think they are opposed to this type of topics. If you object, is it because you don’t want your behavior exposed? I hope that is not the reason. If it is you may want to rethink your choices. Am I banned now?

    ReplyDelete